RESUMO
Objective To explore the effect of fluoxetine on the brain function of bulimia nervosa (BN) patients.Methods Seven female BN patients,who met criteria of the 3rd version Chinese Criteria of Mental Diseases (CCMD-3),accepted functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) examinations before and after the antidepressant treatment (fluoxetine (20 mg/day)) for three months.Seven normal controls accepted the same fMRI examination only at baseline.fMRI imaging was block-design.Blocks of food or non-food stimulus containing pictures selected from International Affective Picture System (IAPS) which were shown by computer automatically.All subjects were evaluated by Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA),Hamilton depression scale (HAMD17) and Likert Scale-likelihood evaluation to the same pictures in the fMRI imaging blocks.Results The average intensity and volume activated in BN before treatment were both significantly lower than that in the control (P＜0.05).But under stimulus of food pictures,bilateral prefrontal cortex and left amygdala of BN patients were significantly activated.After fluoxetine treatment,the intensity and volume activated both increased significantly (P＜0.01) and the main areas being activated were right temporal,cerebellum and bilateral prefrontal cortex.Conclusion Fluoxetine improves the bulimic symptoms of BN patients and decreases abnormal activation of prefrontal and limbic in these areas.The underline mechanism may be related to functions of serotonin system in prefrontal-limbic path.
RESUMO
Objective To study the psychological nursing on the rehabilitation effect of patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS)accompanied by depression.Methods 126 ACS patients were divided into the nursing group(64 cases)and the control group(62 cases)randomly.The control group adopted roUtine rehabilitative nursing measurs.While the nursing group received canonical and selective psychological nursing.The Zung Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS)and hamilton depression scale(HAMD)were used to evaluate the their psychological status.The electrocardiogram,clinical symptom and cardiovascular complications were observed and compared.Results The SDS and HAMD scores were different between the nursing group and the control group(P＜0.01)5 weeks after rehabilitative nursing but not before it.The ischemic changes of electrocardiogram,incidence frequency of angina pectoris and cardiovascular complications were significantly decreased in the nursing group compared with the control group(P＜0.05).Conclusion Psychological nursing could not only alleviate the depression of patients with ACS but also could improve the clinical symptoms of these patients and decrease the incidence frequency of cardiovascular events.
RESUMO
Objective The study is designed to evaluate the difference in identification for depression and clinical effectiveness of its treatment between psychiatrists and non-psychiatric Dhysieians at out-patient departments of general hospitals and to analyze its related factors.Methods Totally,680 patients who visited psychiatric clinics in nine general hospitals of Shanghai at first time were screened by psychiatrists using Composite International Diagnostic Interview(CIDI)for depression and the screening resuhs were compared to the diagnosis made by non-psychiatric physicians as goal-keepers there.Altogether 297 patients with depression were recruited and assessed using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(HAMD)and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale(HAMA).A self-made questionnaire for basic information was used to assess the ability for identification of depression in non-psychiatric physicians of general hospitals.Results Psychiatrists identified depression correctly in 337 of 680 patients who visited psychiatric clinics in general hospitals at their first visit,but non-psychiatric physicians only identified 216 patients,with statistically significant difference(χ2=30.73,P=0.000).A consistent agreement on depression diagnosis between the findings by psychiatrists and by CIDI was reached with Kappa of 0.774,but Kappa for that between the findings by non-psychiatric physicians and CIDI was 0.439.Effectiveness of treatment for depression by psychiatrists was better than that by non-psychiatric physicians,with higher total score and scores for each item of HAMD four,eight and 12 weeks after treatment,respectively(P＜0.05 or P＜0.01).Length of professional work of non-psychiatric physicians and annual time for professional training in management of mental disorders associated with their ability of identification for depression(P＜0.05).Conclusion Ability of non-psychiatric physicians to identify alQd cope with depression in the psychiatric department of general hospitals was insufficient,suggesting that more importance should be attached to the management of service quality at psychiatric department of general hospitals.
